By stage

Hiring your first sales hire at Seed

At Seed, the first sales hire is a process bet, not a bookings bet. You are hiring someone to find a repeatable motion alongside a founder who is still in every deal, and that is a different job from carrying a number inside a machine that already works. We screen for it that way.

Who is this for?

Founder-led sales. No talent function, often no HR at all. You're hiring seller number one or number two, and you are the buyer, the interviewer, and still the best closer in the company.

When should you make this hire?

When founder-led selling has produced enough repeatable wins that the pattern is visible, but the founder has become the constraint on running it.

That is a different trigger from funding. Raising a seed round creates the budget for a salesperson, not the conditions for one to succeed. Two signals that the moment has actually arrived:

• You can describe the last five wins in the same sentence. Same buyer, same pain, roughly the same path. If every deal closed for a different reason there is no motion to hand over yet — the first hire will be asked to find one, which is a harder job and a different profile.
• You are slow-playing conversations you would take if you had the hours. That is demand you already have and cannot serve, which is the safest thing to hire against.

The failure mode on the other side is hiring too late. A founder who has run sales personally for two years often has a motion so shaped around their own credibility that nobody else can run it.

Should you hire an AE or a VP Sales first?

At Seed, the person who will personally close deals — almost always. A VP Sales is a hire you make when there is a team to lead and a motion to scale. At Seed there is usually neither, and a VP hired into that gap ends up doing individual-contributor work they left behind years ago, expensively.

The temptation runs the other way because a VP title feels like the safer bet, and because VPs interview extremely well: they have run the play you are trying to build and can describe it fluently. Describing it and building it from nothing are different skills.

The exception is a founder who does not want to be in sales at all and is prepared to hand the function over. That is a real strategy, but it is a different search — the person has to build the motion and be senior enough to own it, and few people have done both.

What usually goes wrong?

Founders interview against a profile borrowed from a company that has infrastructure they don't have yet. The resume looks strong because the numbers are real, but those numbers came with inbound pipeline, a marketing team, a sales engineer, and a manager who had run the play before. Hire that person into a Seed-stage company and they spend six months waiting for support that was never coming.

The comp structure fails the same way.

A second failure is subtler and shows up later. The hire is capable, the profile was right, and they still stall — because nobody defined what the first six months were supposed to produce. At Seed the honest answer is often "find out whether this motion works", and that is a legitimate goal. But it has to be said out loud, because a seller who believes they were hired to hit a number and is instead running experiments will read their own progress as failure and leave before the answer arrives.

How do you know if the hire will scale?

Mostly you do not, at the point of hiring — and pretending otherwise is how founders talk themselves into the wrong candidate. What you can assess is whether they have operated without the scaffolding you do not have. Three things worth probing, none of which appear on a resume:

• Where did their pipeline come from? A seller whose last role ran on inbound has not demonstrated they can create demand. That is not a flaw; it is a different job from the one you are hiring for.
• What did they do when the message stopped working? Seed-stage positioning changes underneath the seller, repeatedly. You are looking for someone who rewrote their own pitch rather than escalated to marketing.
• Can they describe a deal they lost, specifically? Sellers who have genuinely owned a motion can name the mechanism of a loss. Sellers who inherited one describe losses as circumstances.

At Seed you are underwriting judgement under ambiguity, not proven output inside a system you do not have.

How do we run a Seed GTM search?

The kickoff is a calibration conversation, not an intake form. Our founder built the talent function at a venture-backed startup from zero, which means the conversation starts from what your first hire will actually have to do on a Tuesday, not from a job description template.

From there:

1. 1. Written briefThe kickoff is recorded and turned into a written search brief before any outreach goes out. You see it. If we heard the role wrong, you catch it in week one instead of slate three.
2. 2. Calibration slate firstThe first candidates we send are there to sharpen the target, and we say so. Your reactions to them change the search.
3. 3. Prepped candidatesEveryone who reaches an interview gets a written brief on your company, your interviewers, and your loop. Candidates who understand the business ask better questions and evaluate faster.
4. 4. Reasoned submissionsEvery candidate arrives with a written argument for why this profile fits this search. Not an attachment and a hope.

What do you get?

A shortlist you can act on, candidates who already understand the stage they're walking into, and a written record of what "good" means for this role that survives the search.

Series A → · GTM and sales recruiting → · How we work →